Video viewer app update#
Video viewer app full#
Video viewer app android#
Video viewer app code#

We find this use case very important to users who are traveling or are in locations with limit network bandwidth.

Offline playback and DRM: With a native video player, you are able to support download and offline playback of protected and unprotected content.

These native video players also have access to all other system and device APIs. Both video players have APIвЂ™s that allow you to add functionality around playback, DRM, advertisements, casting/airplay, and analytics.

The most common native video players today are AVPlayer (iOS) and ExoPlayer (Android). All of the components in this solution are built on top of core operating system APIs and functionality. Examples of those features areД«uild a native video player and a native user interface.

Reduced feature set: The HTML5 player is unable support all the features your customers expect (and have with other native video players).

Implementing a communication channel between the web player and native application is tedious and difficult to maintain.

Video viewer app update#

Reduced Interaction with native app: If you want to show supplementary content based on the HTML5 player, you will need to update the appвЂ™s UI with the current video player state.

Also the video startup time is negatively affected as we will show later. This also negatively impacts the battery life of your device.

Video viewer app full#

Low performance: Running the whole HTML5 player inside a web-view component needs more processing power than using a full native player.It is even possible to update the video player over-the-air without updating the whole native app using the app store.

Video viewer app code#

Single code base: Changes to your HTML5 video player will automatically update your mobile app as well.

An organization does not need to invest in engineers with the specific mobile development skill sets required to build a native video player.

Time to Market: Reusing your existing HTML5 video player inside a mobile app requires much less initial development.

Running all this code inside a mobile devices web-view ends up consuming a lot more resources than necessary Pros You are required to write a lot of custom code that differs from your web implementation to support advertisements, DRM, casting, air-play, and the rich-user experience that your customers expect. This approach limits you to the media formats and codecs that the underlying web-view supports. The web-view presents a standard, non-customizable video player user interface that is dependent on the operating system. The web-view enables the multimedia playback capabilities of the underlying browser engine in your native app.ДЄ simple implementation loads a website containing a HTML5 video player (usually reused from your web implementation as shown below) that references the video content you wish to playback.

Video viewer app android#

On iOS and Android devices you can use a web-view component to embed web content into a native application. It will give some guidance for this important decision, and highlight why investing in a native video player gives your customers the best performance, feature set, and user experience. This post will evaluate the pros and cons of each approach. Initially, it may seem easiest to re-use your HTML5 player, but that is not always the best option from evidence weвЂ™ve seen in our comprehensive testing. Online video publishers that decide to launch a mobile app are faced with a decision between reusing their HTML5 player, building a completely native playback experience, or a combination of both approaches.